As I reported in The Carpetbagger of NMB, there is undisputed proof that North Miami Beach Council candidate Yvenoline Dargenson not only does not live in North Miami Beach, but she doesn’t live in Miami-Dade County at all.
As if all the information that I’ve already dug up weren’t enough evidence, NMB Sergeant Richard Silberman’s investigation, as described in his Memorandum, was the icing on the cake.
But nothing tops the latest piece of evidence, I’ll call Smoking Gun Part III, uncovered by Councilwoman Beth Spiegel as outlined in her Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief filed on April 13, 2013 against Yvenoline Dargenson a/k/a Yve Dargenson, Penelope Townsley (in her capacity as Miami-Dade County Supervisor of Elections) and Pamela L. Latimore (in her capacity as North Miami Beach City Clerk).
In her lawsuit, Councilwoman Spiegel listed all the reasons, as outlined in my column and Sergeant Silberman’s Memorandum, that she believes that Yvenoline Dargenson does not live in North Miami Beach, but listed proof that she has not lived in North Miami Beach for the twelve months prior to qualifying to run for office in our city. This qualification requirement is spelled out in black and white in both our city’s Code and Charter.
Councilwoman Spiegel also produced a document that legally proves beyond any doubt whatsoever, reasonable or otherwise, that YVENOLINE IS A LIAR AND A PERJURER!
I already told you about the lawsuit filed against Dargenson and her husband, Frannix Jean-Mary by the River Run Homeowners Association, Inc. for unpaid dues, and that Dargenson was served with that lawsuit IN HER HOME IN MIRAMAR on May 12, 2012. What even I didn’t know, since I’m not a lawyer, was that Dargenson also accepted service on behalf of her husband at the same time.
How is this significant? Glad you asked.
Rule 48.031 (1) (a) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure states:
48.031 Service of process generally; service of witness subpoenas.
(a) Service of original process is made by delivering a copy of it to the person to be served with a copy of the complaint, petition, or other initial pleading or paper or by leaving the copies at his or her usual place of abode with any person residing therein who is 15 years of age or older and informing the person of their contents. Minors who are or have been married shall be served as provided in this section.
By law, process server Barbara Markowitz had to be satisfied that Yvenoline Dargenson was QUALIFIED TO ACCEPT SERVICE ON BEHALF OF HER HUSBAND by swearing on oath that she served a true copy of the Summons to “Yvenoline Jean-Mary, WIFE” at the address of 9620 Boulder Street, Miramar, Florida 33025, “in compliance with State Statute 48.031 (6). YVENOLINE JEAN-MARY is fifteen (15) years of age or older.”
Ms. Markowitz signed and sealed the Return of Service UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY.
Unlike Yvenoline Dargenson, a/k/a MRS. FRANNIX JEAN-MARY, I bet process server Barbara Markowitz is not about to commit perjury!
I tip my hat to Councilwoman Beth Spiegel for a brilliant find! You are an honorary Gadfly.
Folks, I don’t think there’s much more to say about this issue, except that I’m not into beating dead horses.
Here’s my final shoutout:
Like her “mentor,” Frantz Pierre, YVENOLINE DARGENSON IS AN UNDISPUTED LIAR, PERJURER AND COMPLETELY UNQUALIFIED TO RUN FOR OFFICE IN THE CITY OF NORTH MIAMI BEACH!
Any questions?
Stephanie Kienzle
“Spreading the Wealth”
As a member of the City’s Charter review Committee, I have requested the City Clerk to also validate the residency of Ms. Dargenson as she too is a recent appointee to the Charter Review Committeee. In a previous meeting, she cast the deciding vote that resulted in at least two deadlock tie votes. In order to serve as a member of the Charter Review Committee, each appointed member must be a resident of the City of North MIami Beach.
However, I must say that I am not at all surprised by the fact that anyone appointed by Franz Pierre apparently has the same fraudulent personal standards as he does. He’s the guy who has nine registered voters claiming they live in his house and he just happend to win re-election by NINE votes. Since Councilman Pierre is actively campaigning on behalf of Dargenson, I am sure he is fully aware that she does not meet the one year city residency requirement. But things like “residency” are apparently not meant to be taken seriuolsly by Pierre or his appointees.